Late in the day on Thursday, October 17th, a proposed settlement was made public. This settlement would resolve the lawsuits filed by provincial governments, the class action lawsuits filed on behalf of injured smokers and a few other small claims.
This post reports on the response to the settlement by public health agencies and leaders.
The terms of the settlement with the provincial government have been widely criticized for their failure to include measures to reduce smoking or to modify the tobacco trade. The portion of the settlement which resolves class action claims has received widespread support.
Representative extracts of media statements and press releases are shown below.
———————————-
Action on Smoking & Health, Physicians for a Smoke-Free Canada, Quebec Coalition for Tobacco Control: Provincial governments have squandered a unique and historic opportunity to put an end to the tobacco industry
Press release, October 17, 2024.
Apart from the compensation to victims or their descendants in Québec and in the rest of Canada, which is the only positive component of this deal, there is little public health benefit to be found in this arrangement. The settlement provides no roadmap aimed at preventing these very same companies from causing more damage by recruiting new victims, including through new enticing nicotine gadgets.
Despite the tobacco industry having its back against the wall, the provinces choose to negotiate themselves a cash windfall without bothering to change the corporate behaviour at the core of the lawsuits. Provinces have deliberately agreed to allow Big Tobacco to maintain its business model extracting profits from addiction and harm in perpetuity. They have shamelessly turned a blind eye to the damage these very same companies will inflict on future generations.
Canadian Cancer Society criticizes proposed tobacco settlement as inadequate
Press release, October 18, 2024
“The approach in the proposed settlement falls massively short and fails to protect the future health of Canadians properly,” says Rob Cunningham, lawyer for the Canadian Cancer Society. “How can such an approach possibly be justified when we continue to have millions of Canadians who smoke each year and while tobacco remains the leading cause of cancer death? This settlement fails to support public health efforts to reduce smoking.”
The Canadian Lung Association responds to proposed settlement in tobacco lawsuits
Statement, October 18, 2024
We feel that the proposed settlement is not only monetarily insufficient but missing key measures that would prevent the tobacco industry from returning to business as usual.
We urge the government and all parties involved to reconsider this proposed settlement and seek a just outcome that truly addresses the devastating consequences of tobacco-related harm. Canadians have the right to expect a fair and equitable resolution that holds the tobacco industry accountable for its actions and provides adequate compensation for those affected while ensuring that the right supports are in place to protect generations to come.
Campaign for Justice on Tobacco Fraud: Tobacco Settlement Cave In
Press release, October 21, 2024
Tobacco lawyers would argue that the Companies Creditors Arrangement Act exists to ensure the long-term viability of companies that seek protection. We hold that governments ultimately hold all of the cards, legislation, and could have used their muscle in these talks if they had been committed to public health.
“This settlement is an embarrassment,” said Mahood. “Other than providing payments to Quebec smokers harmed by the industry and due via a class action court award, the settlement has no redeeming value. It should be abandoned, not the kids who will be harmed by an industry restored to good health.”
Michael Chaiton, Senior Scientist, CAMH
City News, October 18, 2024
“The lesson of these lawsuits is that cigarettes … should not be a profitable consumer product and that there are alternatives available, he said.”
“Functionally, I think some of the settlement protects the companies to allow them to continue to sell those products in particular, rather than switching over.”
David Hammond, Professor, University of Waterloo
City News, October 18, 2024
“Their business practices essentially haven’t changed and won’t change,” said Hammond.
“The industry still generates billions of profits from cigarettes, and so I think they will continue the practices that have been generating that revenue.”
Rob Cunningham, Canadian Cancer Society
CBC News, October 18, 2024
Rob Cunningham, senior policy analyst for the Canadian Cancer Society, says the proposal does not go far enough. He’s calling on the provinces to make changes before it’s approved.
“This proposed settlement contains nothing to actually reduce smoking,” Cunningham said Friday in an interview with CBC News Network.
Cynthia Callard, Physicians for a Smoke-Free Canada
National Post, October 18, 2024
Callard said the provinces could have taken a much different approach to this suit focused on winding down the industry.
“The government had the option to force the companies into bankruptcy and to find an orderly way to wind up down their business and to actually chase out smoking. Instead, they’ve given them carte blanche to operate,” she said.
Callard said she expects the proposed deal will go through. She said while the deal is a disappointment it is also an opportunity for governments to step up and do a better job regulating the industry, both cigarettes and vaping, because they have failed to do so in the past.
“Obviously, the industry did wrong, it hurt people, that’s what they’re settling about. But governments stood back in those years and let the company operate in that inadequately regulated way,” she said.